CustodyStress
Archive › Documentation absent
Part of the CustodyStress archive of observed Bitcoin custody incidents
CS-01390

Approximately $340,000 in Bitcoin remained on-chain and inaccessible.

Blocked
Case description
A 2025 case involved a Bitcoin holder who had deliberately obscured their cryptocurrency holdings from family members for privacy reasons. Following the holder's unexpected death, the family had no indication that Bitcoin was part of the estate. A forensic accountant engaged to audit the estate discovered unexplained bank transfers to exchanges going back to 2018. Tracing those transfers identified three exchange accounts, two of which had been subsequently withdrawn to self-custody. The on-chain addresses receiving those withdrawals were identified, but the corresponding private keys—without any documented seed phrase—remained unknown. Approximately $340,000 in Bitcoin remained on-chain and inaccessible.
Custody context
Stress conditionDocumentation absent
Custody systemHardware wallet (single key)
OutcomeBlocked
DocumentationUnknown
Year observed2025
CountryUnited States
Structural dependencies observed
Single point of failure
What this illustrates
There was only one way in. When that path was gone, so was access. Access was not recoverable.
Outcome interpretation
Access was not possible under the reported conditions.
Source
Privately Reported
Evidence type
News article
Related cases involving documentation absent
193 cases involve documentation absent 274 cases involve hardware wallet (single key) View archive statistics →
This archive documents observed custody survivability failures. It does not attempt to document all Bitcoin losses or security incidents. Submit a case
← All cases
Framework references
Terms guide
Survives
Access remained possible under the reported conditions.
Constrained
Access remained possible, but only with delay, dependence, or significant difficulty.
Blocked
Access was not possible under the reported conditions.
Indeterminate
There was not enough information to determine the outcome.
Single-person knowledge
Recovery depended on information or capability held by one individual who was unavailable.
Institutional dependence
Recovery depended on a third-party institution or service that was inaccessible or uncooperative.
Documentation gap
Recovery depended on instructions that were missing, incomplete, or unclear.
Authority mismatch
The person with legal authority to act did not have operational access, or vice versa.
Original text
Rate this translation
Your feedback will be used to help improve Google Translate