For Professionals

For estate attorneys, executors, trustees, and advisors working with Bitcoin

What CustodyStress provides

CustodyStress is an independent diagnostic that models how a Bitcoin custody setup behaves under stress — death, incapacity, delay, coercion, or institutional friction — based on information provided at time of assessment.

It produces a stress test result and a set of print-ready reference documents. Each document is designed to be read by someone who has never seen the custody setup before.

For professionals, this means reference-grade artifacts that can be read out of context, forwarded without explanation, cited without endorsement, and discussed without implying recommendations.

Print-ready reference documents

A completed assessment produces a set of print-ready reference documents designed to be read cold — by someone who has never seen the setup and may not understand Bitcoin.

When professionals encounter custody failures

Bitcoin custody failures rarely present as technical problems. They present as coordination failures under stress, discovered only after authority has shifted and context has been lost.

Professionals typically encounter custody when:

• the original owner is unavailable, incapacitated, or deceased
• documentation exists but cannot be operationalized
• legal authority exists without practical access
• custody access is delayed, partial, or contested
• multiple parties disagree about roles, permissions, or timing

At that stage, common professional tools assume intact context and cooperative execution. Checklists assume cooperation and intact context. Recommendations create implied responsibility. Best practices do not survive handoff to heirs or executors. Technical explanations are unreadable to non-technical parties.

CustodyStress describes how custody setups behave under defined stress conditions without introducing advice, direction, or authority, and produces reference-grade artifacts structured for interpretation without the original owner present.

The authority-access gap

In Bitcoin custody, legal authority and operational access are often separate.

A person may have full legal authority to act while lacking the information, credentials, devices, or coordination required to initiate custody access. Conversely, operational access may exist without legal authority.

The distinction is made explicit within the Estate–Custody Alignment Summary, which surfaces exactly where authority and access diverge, giving professionals a concrete reference point rather than an abstract risk.

Common failure patterns

Authority without access

Legal authority does not grant custody access. CustodyStress makes this distinction observable.

Documentation without usability

Documents describe what exists without enabling action when required credentials or context are unavailable. CustodyStress surfaces gaps between documented intent and executable access.

Delay that changes outcomes

Systems remain theoretically recoverable while becoming practically harder to coordinate over time. CustodyStress models delay as a first-class variable.

Partial access that blocks full control

Early access to some assets can destroy later recovery paths. CustodyStress distinguishes partial access from survivability.

Role ambiguity under stress

When multiple parties believe they can act — or no one is clearly empowered — recovery stalls. CustodyStress clarifies role dependencies.

Scope and limitations

CustodyStress artifacts are descriptive reference documents, not instructions. They describe observed system behavior under stress.

They are designed to explain custody behavior under stress, identify dependency patterns and limiting factors, clarify assumptions used in modeling, and provide shared language for discussion.

They do not recommend actions or changes, determine legal sufficiency or compliance, certify safety or correctness, or replace professional judgment.

Every document includes a reference ID, assessment date, model version, and explicit scope and limitations. This allows artifacts to be archived, cited, and revisited without reinterpretation.

Because the instrument is diagnostic, professionals can reference its outputs without adopting advisory responsibility for the custody arrangement itself.

Reference materials and contact

The following documents are provided for reference and citation.

Professional inquiries

professional@custodystress.com

This channel answers questions about how assessments are structured and what the artifacts do and don't cover. It does not provide recommendations, case-specific interpretation, or execution guidance.