Part of the CustodyStress archive of observed Bitcoin custody incidents
CS-01246
Documentation absent — hardware wallet (2024)
BlockedCase description
A 2024 recovery attempt involved a Bitcoin holder who had purchased 1.5 BTC through a peer-to-peer platform in 2019 and stored the private key as a QR code tattoo on their forearm—a technique occasionally promoted in the Bitcoin community as a memorable storage method. After a skin condition required medical treatment of the arm, portions of the tattoo had degraded and the QR code was no longer readable. A dermatologist was consulted about potential imaging techniques to reconstruct the original QR code pattern, without success. The private key was permanently lost.
Custody context
| Stress condition | Documentation absent |
| Custody system | Hardware wallet (single key) |
| Outcome | Blocked |
| Documentation | Unknown |
| Year observed | 2024 |
| Country | International |
Structural dependencies observed
What this illustrates
There was only one way in. When that path was gone, so was access. Access was not recoverable.
Outcome interpretation
Access was not possible under the reported conditions.
Source
Privately Reported
Evidence type
News article
Related cases involving documentation absent
193 cases involve documentation absent
274 cases involve hardware wallet (single key)
View archive statistics →
This archive documents observed custody survivability failures. It does not attempt to document all Bitcoin losses or security incidents.
Submit a case
← All cases
Framework references
Where Bitcoin Custody Intersects Legal and Fiduciary Authority
Where custody creates gaps in estate planning, fiduciary duty, and professional responsibility.
Professional Scope Boundary Matrix
What each professional or product covers, what they do not, and where gaps form between them.
The Independent Assessment Layer in Bitcoin Custody
How independent diagnostic layers emerge when multiple parties depend on shared infrastructure.
Translate