CustodyStress
Archive › Documentation absent
Part of the CustodyStress archive of observed Bitcoin custody incidents
CS-01210

Hidden wallet discovered — hardware wallet (2024)

Survives
Case description
A 2024 estate case involved a husband and wife who had jointly purchased Bitcoin in 2017. When the husband died, the wife—who had relied entirely on her husband to manage the technical custody—discovered she had no knowledge of how to access the holdings. She knew they had used 'some kind of USB device.' Three USB sticks were found in the house: one contained the Electrum wallet software installation file, one contained a wallet.dat file, and one was a personal storage drive unrelated to Bitcoin. She did not know which device was the hardware wallet or whether she needed all three. A technical specialist identified the relevant files and subsequently the associated wallet password through partial-match recovery.
Custody context
Stress conditionDocumentation absent
Custody systemHardware wallet (single key)
OutcomeSurvives
DocumentationUnknown
Year observed2024
CountryUnited States
Structural dependencies observed
Single point of failure
Outcome interpretation
Access remained possible under the reported conditions.
Source
Privately Reported
Evidence type
News article
Related cases involving documentation absent
193 cases involve documentation absent 274 cases involve hardware wallet (single key) View archive statistics →
This archive documents observed custody survivability failures. It does not attempt to document all Bitcoin losses or security incidents. Submit a case
← All cases
Framework references
Terms guide
Survives
Access remained possible under the reported conditions.
Constrained
Access remained possible, but only with delay, dependence, or significant difficulty.
Blocked
Access was not possible under the reported conditions.
Indeterminate
There was not enough information to determine the outcome.
Single-person knowledge
Recovery depended on information or capability held by one individual who was unavailable.
Institutional dependence
Recovery depended on a third-party institution or service that was inaccessible or uncooperative.
Documentation gap
Recovery depended on instructions that were missing, incomplete, or unclear.
Authority mismatch
The person with legal authority to act did not have operational access, or vice versa.
Original text
Rate this translation
Your feedback will be used to help improve Google Translate