CustodyStress
Archive › Documentation absent
Part of the CustodyStress archive of observed Bitcoin custody incidents
CS-00094

A series of 2014 Bitcointalk forum posts documented Bitcoin HYIP operators who held

Blocked
Case description
A series of 2014 Bitcointalk forum posts documented Bitcoin HYIP (High Yield Investment Program) operators who held customer BTC in wallets with no documented terms, no published address verification, and no withdrawal schedule. When these operators went silent, customers had no on-chain evidence of the operators ever holding their BTC.
Custody context
Stress conditionDocumentation absent
Custody systemExchange custody
OutcomeBlocked
DocumentationUnknown
Year observed2014
CountryUnknown
Structural dependencies observed
Undocumented procedure
What this illustrates
Nobody had written down how to get back in. That knowledge existed only in the owner's head. Access was not recoverable.
Outcome interpretation
Access was not possible under the reported conditions.
Source
Publicly Reported
Evidence type
Forum post
Related cases involving documentation absent
193 cases involve documentation absent 512 cases involve exchange custody View archive statistics →
This archive documents observed custody survivability failures. It does not attempt to document all Bitcoin losses or security incidents. Submit a case
← All cases
Framework references
Terms guide
Survives
Access remained possible under the reported conditions.
Constrained
Access remained possible, but only with delay, dependence, or significant difficulty.
Blocked
Access was not possible under the reported conditions.
Indeterminate
There was not enough information to determine the outcome.
Single-person knowledge
Recovery depended on information or capability held by one individual who was unavailable.
Institutional dependence
Recovery depended on a third-party institution or service that was inaccessible or uncooperative.
Documentation gap
Recovery depended on instructions that were missing, incomplete, or unclear.
Authority mismatch
The person with legal authority to act did not have operational access, or vice versa.
Original text
Rate this translation
Your feedback will be used to help improve Google Translate