CustodyStress
Archive › Documentation absent
Part of the CustodyStress archive of observed Bitcoin custody incidents
CS-00129

Documentation absent — exchange custody (2014)

Blocked
Case description
A Bitcoin savings club that had operated informally among a group of friends collapsed in July 2014 when the member designated to hold group funds disappeared. The club had no written agreement, no multi-party signature requirement, and no documentation of each member's contribution. Members had no legal recourse.
Custody context
Stress conditionDocumentation absent
Custody systemExchange custody
OutcomeBlocked
DocumentationUnknown
Year observed2014
CountryUnknown
Structural dependencies observed
Undocumented procedureSingle point of failure
What this illustrates
There was no documentation of how access worked. Without it, there was no path back in. Access was not recoverable.
Outcome interpretation
Access was not possible under the reported conditions.
Source
Publicly Reported
Evidence type
Forum post
Related cases involving documentation absent
167 cases involve documentation absent 471 cases involve exchange custody View archive statistics →
This archive documents observed custody survivability failures. It does not attempt to document all Bitcoin losses or security incidents. Submit a case
← All cases
Framework references
Terms guide
Survives
Access remained possible under the reported conditions.
Constrained
Access remained possible, but only with delay, dependence, or significant difficulty.
Blocked
Access was not possible under the reported conditions.
Indeterminate
There was not enough information to determine the outcome.
Single-person knowledge
Recovery depended on information or capability held by one individual who was unavailable.
Institutional dependence
Recovery depended on a third-party institution or service that was inaccessible or uncooperative.
Documentation gap
Recovery depended on instructions that were missing, incomplete, or unclear.
Authority mismatch
The person with legal authority to act did not have operational access, or vice versa.
Original text
Rate this translation
Your feedback will be used to help improve Google Translate