CustodyStress
Archive › Vendor lockout
Part of the CustodyStress archive of observed Bitcoin custody incidents
CS-01357

Sanctions lockout — exchange custody (2025)

Blocked
Case description
Garantex, a Russia-based cryptocurrency exchange that had been sanctioned by OFAC in April 2022 for facilitating transactions for sanctioned entities, was targeted by a second coordinated enforcement action in March 2025. US, European, and German authorities seized Garantex's web domains and arrested the platform's operator. The seizure effectively cut off all access for Garantex users—primarily Russian nationals—who had cryptocurrency balances on the exchange. Because the platform had been operating under sanctions since 2022, any users who had left funds on it were already in a legally ambiguous situation; the seizure resolved that ambiguity definitively by eliminating access.
Custody context
Stress conditionVendor lockout
Custody systemExchange custody
OutcomeBlocked
DocumentationUnknown
Year observed2025
CountryInternational
Structural dependencies observed
Legal process requiredInstitutional cooperation required
What this illustrates
Before anyone could access the funds, a legal process had to be completed first. Access was not recoverable.
Outcome interpretation
Access was not possible under the reported conditions.
Source
Publicly Reported
Evidence type
News article
Related cases involving vendor lockout
170 cases involve vendor lockout 512 cases involve exchange custody View archive statistics →
This archive documents observed custody survivability failures. It does not attempt to document all Bitcoin losses or security incidents. Submit a case
← All cases
Framework references
Terms guide
Survives
Access remained possible under the reported conditions.
Constrained
Access remained possible, but only with delay, dependence, or significant difficulty.
Blocked
Access was not possible under the reported conditions.
Indeterminate
There was not enough information to determine the outcome.
Single-person knowledge
Recovery depended on information or capability held by one individual who was unavailable.
Institutional dependence
Recovery depended on a third-party institution or service that was inaccessible or uncooperative.
Documentation gap
Recovery depended on instructions that were missing, incomplete, or unclear.
Authority mismatch
The person with legal authority to act did not have operational access, or vice versa.
Original text
Rate this translation
Your feedback will be used to help improve Google Translate