CustodyStress
Archive › Vendor lockout
Part of the CustodyStress archive of observed Bitcoin custody incidents
CS-01305

For creditors who had been frozen since November 2022, the distribution ended

Survives
Case description
Genesis Global Capital completed its debt restructuring in August 2024, distributing approximately $4 billion in digital assets and US dollars to creditors. The distribution used an unprecedented framework of in-kind coin-for-coin recovery that differed fundamentally from FTX's cash-at-petition-date approach. BTC creditors received 51% of their in-kind value at distribution, representing 166% of their petition date value. ETH creditors received 66% of their in-kind amount. The remaining percentage was to be distributed through ongoing DCG recoveries. For creditors who had been frozen since November 2022, the distribution ended a 21-month period of inaccessibility.
Custody context
Stress conditionVendor lockout
Custody systemExchange custody
OutcomeSurvives
DocumentationUnknown
Year observed2024
CountryUnited States
Structural dependencies observed
Institutional cooperation required
Outcome interpretation
Access remained possible under the reported conditions.
Source
Publicly Reported
Evidence type
News article
Related cases involving vendor lockout
170 cases involve vendor lockout 512 cases involve exchange custody View archive statistics →
This archive documents observed custody survivability failures. It does not attempt to document all Bitcoin losses or security incidents. Submit a case
← All cases
Framework references
Terms guide
Survives
Access remained possible under the reported conditions.
Constrained
Access remained possible, but only with delay, dependence, or significant difficulty.
Blocked
Access was not possible under the reported conditions.
Indeterminate
There was not enough information to determine the outcome.
Single-person knowledge
Recovery depended on information or capability held by one individual who was unavailable.
Institutional dependence
Recovery depended on a third-party institution or service that was inaccessible or uncooperative.
Documentation gap
Recovery depended on instructions that were missing, incomplete, or unclear.
Authority mismatch
The person with legal authority to act did not have operational access, or vice versa.
Original text
Rate this translation
Your feedback will be used to help improve Google Translate