CustodyStress
Archive › Vendor lockout
Part of the CustodyStress archive of observed Bitcoin custody incidents
CS-01119

Platform bankruptcy — exchange custody (2023)

Survives
Case description
On 8 May 2023, Bittrex filed for Chapter 11 bankruptcy in Delaware after the SEC sued the exchange in April for operating an unregistered securities exchange. Unlike most 2022 exchange collapses, Bittrex was solvent—it held 100% of customer assets and pledged to return all funds in-kind. However, the bankruptcy process still created a temporary access block: customers who had not withdrawn before the filing needed to navigate the formal claims process to retrieve their Bitcoin and other holdings.
Custody context
Stress conditionVendor lockout
Custody systemExchange custody
OutcomeSurvives
DocumentationUnknown
Year observed2023
CountryUnited States
Structural dependencies observed
Institutional cooperation required
Outcome interpretation
Access remained possible under the reported conditions.
Source
Publicly Reported
Evidence type
News article
Related cases involving vendor lockout
170 cases involve vendor lockout 512 cases involve exchange custody View archive statistics →
This archive documents observed custody survivability failures. It does not attempt to document all Bitcoin losses or security incidents. Submit a case
← All cases
Framework references
Terms guide
Survives
Access remained possible under the reported conditions.
Constrained
Access remained possible, but only with delay, dependence, or significant difficulty.
Blocked
Access was not possible under the reported conditions.
Indeterminate
There was not enough information to determine the outcome.
Single-person knowledge
Recovery depended on information or capability held by one individual who was unavailable.
Institutional dependence
Recovery depended on a third-party institution or service that was inaccessible or uncooperative.
Documentation gap
Recovery depended on instructions that were missing, incomplete, or unclear.
Authority mismatch
The person with legal authority to act did not have operational access, or vice versa.