CustodyStress
Archive › Passphrase unavailable
Part of the CustodyStress archive of observed Bitcoin custody incidents
CS-01385

Passphrase unavailable — Ledger Nano S (2025)

Blocked
Case description
A 2025 case involved a Ledger Nano S that had been used with a BIP39 passphrase—the optional 25th word—since 2020. The holder had stored the passphrase separately from the seed phrase as a security measure. In 2025, the holder relocated internationally and during the move the document containing the passphrase was lost. The seed phrase backup remained intact. The holder could restore the base wallet (with the seed phrase alone) and could see it held a small balance used for testing. The main holding wallet—which used the passphrase-derived path—showed no balance on the base derivation path. The passphrase could have been any character string of any length. With no memory of its construction, recovery was technically impossible.
Custody context
Stress conditionPassphrase unavailable
Custody systemHardware wallet (single key)
OutcomeBlocked
DocumentationUnknown
Year observed2025
CountryInternational
Structural dependencies observed
Single point of failure
What this illustrates
The seed phrase was there, but the passphrase that unlocked it was gone. Both are required. Access was not recoverable.
Outcome interpretation
Access was not possible under the reported conditions.
Source
Privately Reported
Evidence type
News article
Related cases involving passphrase unavailable
217 cases involve passphrase unavailable 274 cases involve hardware wallet (single key) View archive statistics →
This archive documents observed custody survivability failures. It does not attempt to document all Bitcoin losses or security incidents. Submit a case
← All cases
Framework references
Terms guide
Survives
Access remained possible under the reported conditions.
Constrained
Access remained possible, but only with delay, dependence, or significant difficulty.
Blocked
Access was not possible under the reported conditions.
Indeterminate
There was not enough information to determine the outcome.
Single-person knowledge
Recovery depended on information or capability held by one individual who was unavailable.
Institutional dependence
Recovery depended on a third-party institution or service that was inaccessible or uncooperative.
Documentation gap
Recovery depended on instructions that were missing, incomplete, or unclear.
Authority mismatch
The person with legal authority to act did not have operational access, or vice versa.
Original text
Rate this translation
Your feedback will be used to help improve Google Translate