CustodyStress
Archive › Owner incapacity
Part of the CustodyStress archive of observed Bitcoin custody incidents
CS-01188

Hidden wallet discovered — hardware wallet (2023)

Indeterminate
Case description
A North Carolina family in 2023 sought to access Bitcoin held by an incapacitated relative who had a self-custody setup. They had a durable power of attorney (POA) drafted before RUFADAA's adoption in the state. The attorney discovered the POA did not contain explicit digital asset authority language required under RUFADAA. Without a court order—which would take months to obtain and might be denied—they had no legal basis to access the wallet even if they found the seed phrase. The case required a separate court proceeding to establish digital asset authority before any technical access could be attempted.
Custody context
Stress conditionOwner incapacity
Custody systemHardware wallet (single key)
OutcomeIndeterminate
DocumentationUnknown
Year observed2023
CountryUnited States
Structural dependencies observed
Legal process requiredSingle point of failure
What this illustrates
Before anyone could access the funds, a legal process had to be completed first. It's not clear whether anyone ever regained access.
Outcome interpretation
Not enough information is available to determine the outcome.
Source
Privately Reported
Evidence type
News article
Related cases involving owner incapacity
68 cases involve owner incapacity 274 cases involve hardware wallet (single key) View archive statistics →
This archive documents observed custody survivability failures. It does not attempt to document all Bitcoin losses or security incidents. Submit a case
← All cases
Framework references
Terms guide
Survives
Access remained possible under the reported conditions.
Constrained
Access remained possible, but only with delay, dependence, or significant difficulty.
Blocked
Access was not possible under the reported conditions.
Indeterminate
There was not enough information to determine the outcome.
Single-person knowledge
Recovery depended on information or capability held by one individual who was unavailable.
Institutional dependence
Recovery depended on a third-party institution or service that was inaccessible or uncooperative.
Documentation gap
Recovery depended on instructions that were missing, incomplete, or unclear.
Authority mismatch
The person with legal authority to act did not have operational access, or vice versa.
Original text
Rate this translation
Your feedback will be used to help improve Google Translate