CustodyStress
Archive › Owner incapacity
Part of the CustodyStress archive of observed Bitcoin custody incidents
CS-01388

Owner incapacity — Coinbase (2025)

Constrained
Case description
A 2025 UK elder care case involved an 81-year-old Coinbase user diagnosed with vascular dementia whose cognitive decline had progressed to the point where they could no longer remember their account password or the answers to security questions. Their son held a registered Lasting Power of Attorney (LPA) for financial decisions. Coinbase's estate and incapacity access process required the LPA registration certificate, a copy of the LPA document, and proof of the attorney's identity. The process was completed in approximately six weeks but required the son to correspond with Coinbase's specialist compliance team rather than standard customer support—a pathway that many families in similar situations did not know existed.
Custody context
Stress conditionOwner incapacity
Custody systemExchange custody
OutcomeConstrained
DocumentationUnknown
Year observed2025
CountryUnited Kingdom
Structural dependencies observed
Institutional cooperation requiredLegal process required
What this illustrates
Getting access back required help from an institution — and that help wasn't available. Whether full access was ultimately possible is unclear, but significant delay or outside intervention was involved.
Outcome interpretation
Access remained possible, but only with delay, dependence, or significant difficulty.
Source
Privately Reported
Evidence type
News article
Related cases involving owner incapacity
68 cases involve owner incapacity 512 cases involve exchange custody View archive statistics →
This archive documents observed custody survivability failures. It does not attempt to document all Bitcoin losses or security incidents. Submit a case
← All cases
Framework references
Terms guide
Survives
Access remained possible under the reported conditions.
Constrained
Access remained possible, but only with delay, dependence, or significant difficulty.
Blocked
Access was not possible under the reported conditions.
Indeterminate
There was not enough information to determine the outcome.
Single-person knowledge
Recovery depended on information or capability held by one individual who was unavailable.
Institutional dependence
Recovery depended on a third-party institution or service that was inaccessible or uncooperative.
Documentation gap
Recovery depended on instructions that were missing, incomplete, or unclear.
Authority mismatch
The person with legal authority to act did not have operational access, or vice versa.
Original text
Rate this translation
Your feedback will be used to help improve Google Translate