CustodyStress
Archive › Owner death
Part of the CustodyStress archive of observed Bitcoin custody incidents
CS-00856

The solicitor's office had relocated during COVID lockdowns and had not updated their

Survives
Case description
An estate attorney documented an August 2020 case in which the deceased had created an elaborate multi-step access system for their Bitcoin involving a safe, an encrypted USB drive, and a final decryption key stored in a solicitor's file. The solicitor's office had relocated during COVID lockdowns and had not updated their contact information. Locating the file took four months.
Custody context
Stress conditionOwner death
Custody systemMobile or software wallet
OutcomeSurvives
DocumentationUnknown
Year observed2020
CountryUnknown
Structural dependencies observed
Single point of failureUndocumented procedure
Outcome interpretation
Access remained possible under the reported conditions.
Source
Publicly Reported
Evidence type
Forum post
Related cases involving owner death
119 cases involve owner death 572 cases involve mobile or software wallet View archive statistics →
This archive documents observed custody survivability failures. It does not attempt to document all Bitcoin losses or security incidents. Submit a case
← All cases
Framework references
Terms guide
Survives
Access remained possible under the reported conditions.
Constrained
Access remained possible, but only with delay, dependence, or significant difficulty.
Blocked
Access was not possible under the reported conditions.
Indeterminate
There was not enough information to determine the outcome.
Single-person knowledge
Recovery depended on information or capability held by one individual who was unavailable.
Institutional dependence
Recovery depended on a third-party institution or service that was inaccessible or uncooperative.
Documentation gap
Recovery depended on instructions that were missing, incomplete, or unclear.
Authority mismatch
The person with legal authority to act did not have operational access, or vice versa.