CustodyStress
Archive › Owner death
Part of the CustodyStress archive of observed Bitcoin custody incidents
CS-01380

A family member later discovered that the holder had been posting about Bitcoin on

Blocked
Case description
A 2025 UK estate case involved a holder who had purchased Bitcoin through Coinbase in 2018 and subsequently transferred all of it to a self-custody hardware wallet—a detail not reflected in any documentation the family could find. The Coinbase account showed zero balance when the executor accessed it following the owner's death. The executor, believing the Coinbase account represented the entirety of the holdings, closed the probate estate without conducting further investigation. A family member later discovered that the holder had been posting about Bitcoin on a pseudonymous forum account, and by tracing the wallet addresses referenced in those posts, determined that approximately 2.3 BTC sat unspent in a wallet for which no recovery path was known.
Custody context
Stress conditionOwner death
Custody systemHardware wallet (single key)
OutcomeBlocked
DocumentationUnknown
Year observed2025
CountryUnited Kingdom
Structural dependencies observed
Single point of failure
What this illustrates
There was only one way in. When that path was gone, so was access. Access was not recoverable.
Outcome interpretation
Access was not possible under the reported conditions.
Source
Privately Reported
Evidence type
News article
Related cases involving owner death
119 cases involve owner death 274 cases involve hardware wallet (single key) View archive statistics →
This archive documents observed custody survivability failures. It does not attempt to document all Bitcoin losses or security incidents. Submit a case
← All cases
Framework references
Terms guide
Survives
Access remained possible under the reported conditions.
Constrained
Access remained possible, but only with delay, dependence, or significant difficulty.
Blocked
Access was not possible under the reported conditions.
Indeterminate
There was not enough information to determine the outcome.
Single-person knowledge
Recovery depended on information or capability held by one individual who was unavailable.
Institutional dependence
Recovery depended on a third-party institution or service that was inaccessible or uncooperative.
Documentation gap
Recovery depended on instructions that were missing, incomplete, or unclear.
Authority mismatch
The person with legal authority to act did not have operational access, or vice versa.
Original text
Rate this translation
Your feedback will be used to help improve Google Translate