CustodyStress
Archive › Owner death
Part of the CustodyStress archive of observed Bitcoin custody incidents
CS-01239

Owner death — 2-of-3 multisig (2024)

Survives
Case description
A 2024 case involved a Bitcoin holder who had been meticulous about security but had not planned for incapacity or death. They had used a 2-of-3 multisignature setup with three hardware wallet devices. One key was stored at home, one at a bank safe deposit box, and one with a trusted friend. The holder died suddenly without leaving any documentation of the multisig configuration, which wallets corresponded to which keys, or what software was needed to construct a signing transaction. The family located all three devices and could physically access them, but could not reconstruct the multisig wallet without technical guidance, which required a specialist recovery firm and several months of work.
Custody context
Stress conditionOwner death
Custody systemHardware wallet (single key)
OutcomeSurvives
DocumentationUnknown
Year observed2024
CountryUnited States
Structural dependencies observed
Single point of failure
Outcome interpretation
Access remained possible under the reported conditions.
Source
Privately Reported
Evidence type
News article
Related cases involving owner death
119 cases involve owner death 274 cases involve hardware wallet (single key) View archive statistics →
This archive documents observed custody survivability failures. It does not attempt to document all Bitcoin losses or security incidents. Submit a case
← All cases
Framework references
Terms guide
Survives
Access remained possible under the reported conditions.
Constrained
Access remained possible, but only with delay, dependence, or significant difficulty.
Blocked
Access was not possible under the reported conditions.
Indeterminate
There was not enough information to determine the outcome.
Single-person knowledge
Recovery depended on information or capability held by one individual who was unavailable.
Institutional dependence
Recovery depended on a third-party institution or service that was inaccessible or uncooperative.
Documentation gap
Recovery depended on instructions that were missing, incomplete, or unclear.
Authority mismatch
The person with legal authority to act did not have operational access, or vice versa.
Original text
Rate this translation
Your feedback will be used to help improve Google Translate