CustodyStress
Archive › Owner death
Part of the CustodyStress archive of observed Bitcoin custody incidents
CS-01297

The wallet showed a balance of 4.7 BTC.

Survives
Case description
A 2024 estate case in New York involved a deceased holder whose family found a laminated card in a safety deposit box with a 24-word seed phrase. The seed phrase was correct and functional—the family successfully restored the wallet using Ledger Live. The wallet showed a balance of 4.7 BTC. However, the family then discovered a second hardware device in a desk drawer that showed a different balance—also 4.7 BTC on a separate address. The family could not determine which device represented the actual held balance, or whether both were funded. It was eventually determined through blockchain analysis that both were funded, and the family had discovered a complete backup situation rather than a double-count.
Custody context
Stress conditionOwner death
Custody systemHardware wallet (single key)
OutcomeSurvives
DocumentationUnknown
Year observed2024
CountryUnited States
Structural dependencies observed
Single point of failure
Outcome interpretation
Access remained possible under the reported conditions.
Source
Privately Reported
Evidence type
News article
Related cases involving owner death
119 cases involve owner death 274 cases involve hardware wallet (single key) View archive statistics →
This archive documents observed custody survivability failures. It does not attempt to document all Bitcoin losses or security incidents. Submit a case
← All cases
Framework references
Terms guide
Survives
Access remained possible under the reported conditions.
Constrained
Access remained possible, but only with delay, dependence, or significant difficulty.
Blocked
Access was not possible under the reported conditions.
Indeterminate
There was not enough information to determine the outcome.
Single-person knowledge
Recovery depended on information or capability held by one individual who was unavailable.
Institutional dependence
Recovery depended on a third-party institution or service that was inaccessible or uncooperative.
Documentation gap
Recovery depended on instructions that were missing, incomplete, or unclear.
Authority mismatch
The person with legal authority to act did not have operational access, or vice versa.
Original text
Rate this translation
Your feedback will be used to help improve Google Translate