CustodyStress
Archive › Owner death
Part of the CustodyStress archive of observed Bitcoin custody incidents
CS-01223

Estate access failure — Coinbase (2024)

Survives
Case description
An Australian estate case in 2024 involved a deceased holder whose Coinbase account was identified by their executor but who had used a mobile phone number for two-factor authentication that was associated with a pre-paid SIM card no longer in service. Coinbase's estate access process could not proceed without either SMS-based 2FA verification or a lengthy alternative identity verification process involving notarised documents submitted to Coinbase's trust and safety team. The process, while ultimately successful, required approximately 12 weeks—during which the Bitcoin in the account appreciated substantially, highlighting how 2FA phone dependency creates a post-death access barrier even when all other credentials are available.
Custody context
Stress conditionOwner death
Custody systemExchange custody
OutcomeSurvives
DocumentationUnknown
Year observed2024
CountryAustralia
Structural dependencies observed
Institutional cooperation required
Outcome interpretation
Access remained possible under the reported conditions.
Source
Privately Reported
Evidence type
News article
Related cases involving owner death
119 cases involve owner death 512 cases involve exchange custody View archive statistics →
This archive documents observed custody survivability failures. It does not attempt to document all Bitcoin losses or security incidents. Submit a case
← All cases
Framework references
Terms guide
Survives
Access remained possible under the reported conditions.
Constrained
Access remained possible, but only with delay, dependence, or significant difficulty.
Blocked
Access was not possible under the reported conditions.
Indeterminate
There was not enough information to determine the outcome.
Single-person knowledge
Recovery depended on information or capability held by one individual who was unavailable.
Institutional dependence
Recovery depended on a third-party institution or service that was inaccessible or uncooperative.
Documentation gap
Recovery depended on instructions that were missing, incomplete, or unclear.
Authority mismatch
The person with legal authority to act did not have operational access, or vice versa.
Original text
Rate this translation
Your feedback will be used to help improve Google Translate