CustodyStress
Archive › Owner death
Part of the CustodyStress archive of observed Bitcoin custody incidents
CS-01227

Owner death — Kraken (2024)

Survives
Case description
A 2024 exchange estate access case on Kraken involved a beneficiary who held the deceased's death certificate and a copy of the will but encountered a verification requirement specific to Kraken's estate process: the account needed to be unlocked from two-factor authentication before estate access could be granted. The deceased had used a Google Authenticator app on a phone that was no longer accessible. Kraken's estate team required the beneficiary to submit a police report, notarised death certificate, letters testamentary, and a formal written waiver request before agreeing to bypass the 2FA requirement. The process took approximately 10 weeks.
Custody context
Stress conditionOwner death
Custody systemExchange custody
OutcomeSurvives
DocumentationUnknown
Year observed2024
CountryUnited States
Structural dependencies observed
Institutional cooperation requiredLegal process required
Outcome interpretation
Access remained possible under the reported conditions.
Source
Privately Reported
Evidence type
News article
Related cases involving owner death
119 cases involve owner death 512 cases involve exchange custody View archive statistics →
This archive documents observed custody survivability failures. It does not attempt to document all Bitcoin losses or security incidents. Submit a case
← All cases
Framework references
Terms guide
Survives
Access remained possible under the reported conditions.
Constrained
Access remained possible, but only with delay, dependence, or significant difficulty.
Blocked
Access was not possible under the reported conditions.
Indeterminate
There was not enough information to determine the outcome.
Single-person knowledge
Recovery depended on information or capability held by one individual who was unavailable.
Institutional dependence
Recovery depended on a third-party institution or service that was inaccessible or uncooperative.
Documentation gap
Recovery depended on instructions that were missing, incomplete, or unclear.
Authority mismatch
The person with legal authority to act did not have operational access, or vice versa.
Original text
Rate this translation
Your feedback will be used to help improve Google Translate