CustodyStress
Archive › Owner death
Part of the CustodyStress archive of observed Bitcoin custody incidents
CS-01114

Platform bankruptcy — Celsius (2023)

Indeterminate
Case description
Estate executors dealing with Celsius, Voyager, FTX, or BlockFi holdings in 2023 faced a compounded custody problem: the deceased had held Bitcoin on one or more bankrupt exchanges, and the executor needed to simultaneously navigate probate proceedings and bankruptcy claims. Most bankruptcy claims portals required the account holder's login credentials or identity verification that only the deceased could provide. Executors without access to the original account needed court orders and extended coordination with bankruptcy administrators to substitute as claimants.
Custody context
Stress conditionOwner death
Custody systemExchange custody
OutcomeIndeterminate
DocumentationUnknown
Year observed2023
CountryUnited States
Structural dependencies observed
Institutional cooperation requiredLegal process required
What this illustrates
Getting access back required help from an institution — and that help wasn't available. It's not clear whether anyone ever regained access.
Outcome interpretation
Not enough information is available to determine the outcome.
Source
Publicly Reported
Evidence type
News article
Related cases involving owner death
119 cases involve owner death 512 cases involve exchange custody View archive statistics →
This archive documents observed custody survivability failures. It does not attempt to document all Bitcoin losses or security incidents. Submit a case
← All cases
Framework references
Terms guide
Survives
Access remained possible under the reported conditions.
Constrained
Access remained possible, but only with delay, dependence, or significant difficulty.
Blocked
Access was not possible under the reported conditions.
Indeterminate
There was not enough information to determine the outcome.
Single-person knowledge
Recovery depended on information or capability held by one individual who was unavailable.
Institutional dependence
Recovery depended on a third-party institution or service that was inaccessible or uncooperative.
Documentation gap
Recovery depended on instructions that were missing, incomplete, or unclear.
Authority mismatch
The person with legal authority to act did not have operational access, or vice versa.
Original text
Rate this translation
Your feedback will be used to help improve Google Translate