CustodyStress
Archive › Owner death
Part of the CustodyStress archive of observed Bitcoin custody incidents
CS-00188

A Cryptsy account holder died in April 2015.

Blocked
Case description
A Cryptsy account holder died in April 2015. Their estate filed a claim with the exchange. Unknown to the estate, Cryptsy was already effectively insolvent at the time of death, having concealed the 2014 hack. When Cryptsy collapsed in December 2015, the estate's claim was treated as an unsecured creditor claim in a pool that recovered cents on the dollar.
Custody context
Stress conditionOwner death
Custody systemExchange custody
OutcomeBlocked
DocumentationUnknown
Year observed2015
CountryUnknown
Structural dependencies observed
Single point of failureUndocumented procedureLegal process required
What this illustrates
There was only one way in. When that path was gone, so was access. Access was not recoverable.
Outcome interpretation
Access was not possible under the reported conditions.
Source
Publicly Reported
Evidence type
News article
Related cases involving owner death
119 cases involve owner death 512 cases involve exchange custody View archive statistics →
This archive documents observed custody survivability failures. It does not attempt to document all Bitcoin losses or security incidents. Submit a case
← All cases
Framework references
Terms guide
Survives
Access remained possible under the reported conditions.
Constrained
Access remained possible, but only with delay, dependence, or significant difficulty.
Blocked
Access was not possible under the reported conditions.
Indeterminate
There was not enough information to determine the outcome.
Single-person knowledge
Recovery depended on information or capability held by one individual who was unavailable.
Institutional dependence
Recovery depended on a third-party institution or service that was inaccessible or uncooperative.
Documentation gap
Recovery depended on instructions that were missing, incomplete, or unclear.
Authority mismatch
The person with legal authority to act did not have operational access, or vice versa.
Original text
Rate this translation
Your feedback will be used to help improve Google Translate