CustodyStress
Archive › Multisig quorum failure
Part of the CustodyStress archive of observed Bitcoin custody incidents
CS-00332

Multisig quorum failure — 3-of-5 multisig (2016)

Blocked
Case description
A June 2016 forum case describes a startup that used a 3-of-5 multisig for its Bitcoin treasury. The company went through a hostile acquisition and three of the five key holders aligned with the acquirer, who used their majority to move funds to addresses controlled by the acquiring entity. The two remaining pre-acquisition key holders had no legal recourse as the company had been legitimately acquired.
Custody context
Stress conditionMultisig quorum failure
Custody systemMobile or software wallet
OutcomeBlocked
DocumentationUnknown
Year observed2016
CountryUnknown
Structural dependencies observed
Legal process requiredMulti-party coordination
What this illustrates
Before anyone could access the funds, a legal process had to be completed first. Access was not recoverable.
Outcome interpretation
Access was not possible under the reported conditions.
Source
Publicly Reported
Evidence type
Forum post
Related cases involving multisig quorum failure
75 cases involve multisig quorum failure 569 cases involve mobile or software wallet View archive statistics →
This archive documents observed custody survivability failures. It does not attempt to document all Bitcoin losses or security incidents. Submit a case
← All cases
Framework references
Terms guide
Survives
Access remained possible under the reported conditions.
Constrained
Access remained possible, but only with delay, dependence, or significant difficulty.
Blocked
Access was not possible under the reported conditions.
Indeterminate
There was not enough information to determine the outcome.
Single-person knowledge
Recovery depended on information or capability held by one individual who was unavailable.
Institutional dependence
Recovery depended on a third-party institution or service that was inaccessible or uncooperative.
Documentation gap
Recovery depended on instructions that were missing, incomplete, or unclear.
Authority mismatch
The person with legal authority to act did not have operational access, or vice versa.
Original text
Rate this translation
Your feedback will be used to help improve Google Translate