CustodyStress
Archive › Multisig quorum failure
Part of the CustodyStress archive of observed Bitcoin custody incidents
CS-00269

Multisig quorum failure — software wallet 2015

Survives
Case description
A Bitcoin inheritance arrangement used a 2-of-3 multisig where the testator held two keys and a trusted friend held the third. The testator became seriously ill and was unable to operate their hardware wallet. The trusted friend's single key was insufficient to move funds. A court-appointed trustee had to obtain specialist assistance to access the other keys on behalf of the incapacitated testator.
Custody context
Stress conditionMultisig quorum failure
Custody systemMobile or software wallet
OutcomeSurvives
DocumentationUnknown
Year observed2015
CountryUnknown
Structural dependencies observed
Legal process requiredSingle point of failureHardware device required
Outcome interpretation
Access remained possible under the reported conditions.
Source
Publicly Reported
Evidence type
Forum post
Related cases involving multisig quorum failure
75 cases involve multisig quorum failure 569 cases involve mobile or software wallet View archive statistics →
This archive documents observed custody survivability failures. It does not attempt to document all Bitcoin losses or security incidents. Submit a case
← All cases
Framework references
Terms guide
Survives
Access remained possible under the reported conditions.
Constrained
Access remained possible, but only with delay, dependence, or significant difficulty.
Blocked
Access was not possible under the reported conditions.
Indeterminate
There was not enough information to determine the outcome.
Single-person knowledge
Recovery depended on information or capability held by one individual who was unavailable.
Institutional dependence
Recovery depended on a third-party institution or service that was inaccessible or uncooperative.
Documentation gap
Recovery depended on instructions that were missing, incomplete, or unclear.
Authority mismatch
The person with legal authority to act did not have operational access, or vice versa.
Original text
Rate this translation
Your feedback will be used to help improve Google Translate