CustodyStress
Archive › Multisig quorum failure
Part of the CustodyStress archive of observed Bitcoin custody incidents
CS-01316

Multisig quorum failure — institutional custody (2025)

Constrained
Case description
A 2025 case involved a Unchained Capital vault customer whose co-signing arrangement required periodic identity re-verification. After an extended period of non-engagement, Unchained suspended the customer's account pending reverification—a process that required government ID confirmation and a live video call with the compliance team. The customer was in a remote region with limited connectivity and was unable to complete the video verification for approximately six weeks. During this period, they retained access to their wallet through their own two keys (which reached quorum in the 2-of-3 arrangement) but could not use Unchained's server key if needed. The situation resolved when connectivity was restored.
Custody context
Stress conditionMultisig quorum failure
Custody systemInstitutional custody
OutcomeConstrained
DocumentationUnknown
Year observed2025
CountryInternational
Structural dependencies observed
Institutional cooperation requiredMulti-party coordination
What this illustrates
Getting access back required help from an institution — and that help wasn't available. Whether full access was ultimately possible is unclear, but significant delay or outside intervention was involved.
Outcome interpretation
Access remained possible, but only with delay, dependence, or significant difficulty.
Source
Publicly Reported
Evidence type
News article
Related cases involving multisig quorum failure
77 cases involve multisig quorum failure 10 cases involve institutional custody View archive statistics →
This archive documents observed custody survivability failures. It does not attempt to document all Bitcoin losses or security incidents. Submit a case
← All cases
Framework references
Terms guide
Survives
Access remained possible under the reported conditions.
Constrained
Access remained possible, but only with delay, dependence, or significant difficulty.
Blocked
Access was not possible under the reported conditions.
Indeterminate
There was not enough information to determine the outcome.
Single-person knowledge
Recovery depended on information or capability held by one individual who was unavailable.
Institutional dependence
Recovery depended on a third-party institution or service that was inaccessible or uncooperative.
Documentation gap
Recovery depended on instructions that were missing, incomplete, or unclear.
Authority mismatch
The person with legal authority to act did not have operational access, or vice versa.
Original text
Rate this translation
Your feedback will be used to help improve Google Translate