CustodyStress
Archive › Multisig quorum failure
Part of the CustodyStress archive of observed Bitcoin custody incidents
CS-01387

Hidden wallet discovered — institutional custody (2025)

Constrained
Case description
A 2025 Bitcoin custody service consolidation saw two mid-sized collaborative custody providers merge. During the merger integration period, customers of the acquired firm discovered that their multisig key configurations were temporarily suspended while the acquiring firm's systems were updated to support the legacy signing formats. Customers retained access to their wallets through their own keys but could not use the acquired firm's server key for co-signing during the migration window. The disruption lasted approximately three weeks, during which large transactions that required the server key's co-signature could not be executed.
Custody context
Stress conditionMultisig quorum failure
Custody systemInstitutional custody
OutcomeConstrained
DocumentationUnknown
Year observed2025
CountryInternational
Structural dependencies observed
Institutional cooperation requiredMulti-party coordination
What this illustrates
Getting access back required help from an institution — and that help wasn't available. Whether full access was ultimately possible is unclear, but significant delay or outside intervention was involved.
Outcome interpretation
Access remained possible, but only with delay, dependence, or significant difficulty.
Source
Publicly Reported
Evidence type
News article
Related cases involving multisig quorum failure
77 cases involve multisig quorum failure 10 cases involve institutional custody View archive statistics →
This archive documents observed custody survivability failures. It does not attempt to document all Bitcoin losses or security incidents. Submit a case
← All cases
Framework references
Terms guide
Survives
Access remained possible under the reported conditions.
Constrained
Access remained possible, but only with delay, dependence, or significant difficulty.
Blocked
Access was not possible under the reported conditions.
Indeterminate
There was not enough information to determine the outcome.
Single-person knowledge
Recovery depended on information or capability held by one individual who was unavailable.
Institutional dependence
Recovery depended on a third-party institution or service that was inaccessible or uncooperative.
Documentation gap
Recovery depended on instructions that were missing, incomplete, or unclear.
Authority mismatch
The person with legal authority to act did not have operational access, or vice versa.
Original text
Rate this translation
Your feedback will be used to help improve Google Translate