CustodyStress
Archive › Multisig quorum failure
Part of the CustodyStress archive of observed Bitcoin custody incidents
CS-01113

Multisig quorum failure — 2-of-3 multisig (2023)

Indeterminate
Case description
A corporate treasury that had held Bitcoin in a 2-of-3 multisignature arrangement since 2021 encountered quorum failure in 2023 when one key holder—a board member—resigned and declined to participate in further transactions. The remaining two key holders constituted quorum and could theoretically transact, but the resigned member held their key on a hardware device they had kept and refused to transfer. Legal proceedings were required to compel return of the key or obtain a court order recognizing the other two signers as sufficient.
Custody context
Stress conditionMultisig quorum failure
Custody systemInstitutional custody
OutcomeIndeterminate
DocumentationUnknown
Year observed2023
CountryInternational
Structural dependencies observed
Multi-party coordination
What this illustrates
Recovery needed multiple people to act together — and getting everyone to coordinate wasn't possible. It's not clear whether anyone ever regained access.
Outcome interpretation
Not enough information is available to determine the outcome.
Source
Publicly Reported
Evidence type
News article
Related cases involving multisig quorum failure
77 cases involve multisig quorum failure 10 cases involve institutional custody View archive statistics →
This archive documents observed custody survivability failures. It does not attempt to document all Bitcoin losses or security incidents. Submit a case
← All cases
Framework references
Terms guide
Survives
Access remained possible under the reported conditions.
Constrained
Access remained possible, but only with delay, dependence, or significant difficulty.
Blocked
Access was not possible under the reported conditions.
Indeterminate
There was not enough information to determine the outcome.
Single-person knowledge
Recovery depended on information or capability held by one individual who was unavailable.
Institutional dependence
Recovery depended on a third-party institution or service that was inaccessible or uncooperative.
Documentation gap
Recovery depended on instructions that were missing, incomplete, or unclear.
Authority mismatch
The person with legal authority to act did not have operational access, or vice versa.
Original text
Rate this translation
Your feedback will be used to help improve Google Translate