CustodyStress
Archive › Multisig quorum failure
Part of the CustodyStress archive of observed Bitcoin custody incidents
CS-01001

Multisig quorum failure — 2-of-3 multisig (2022)

Indeterminate
Case description
A crypto investment fund using a 2-of-3 multisignature custody arrangement lost effective access to its Bitcoin holdings in June 2022 when one key holder—a co-founder—left the firm acrimoniously and refused to participate in transactions. Although the fund theoretically needed only two of three signers, the remaining two signers were in different geographic locations with no pre-arranged key ceremony process, and the legal dispute created uncertainty about whether transactions could be executed without the departed partner's knowledge. The funds were effectively frozen pending legal resolution.
Custody context
Stress conditionMultisig quorum failure
Custody systemInstitutional custody
OutcomeIndeterminate
DocumentationUnknown
Year observed2022
CountryInternational
Structural dependencies observed
Multi-party coordination
What this illustrates
Recovery needed multiple people to act together — and getting everyone to coordinate wasn't possible. It's not clear whether anyone ever regained access.
Outcome interpretation
Not enough information is available to determine the outcome.
Source
Publicly Reported
Evidence type
News article
Related cases involving multisig quorum failure
77 cases involve multisig quorum failure 10 cases involve institutional custody View archive statistics →
This archive documents observed custody survivability failures. It does not attempt to document all Bitcoin losses or security incidents. Submit a case
← All cases
Framework references
Terms guide
Survives
Access remained possible under the reported conditions.
Constrained
Access remained possible, but only with delay, dependence, or significant difficulty.
Blocked
Access was not possible under the reported conditions.
Indeterminate
There was not enough information to determine the outcome.
Single-person knowledge
Recovery depended on information or capability held by one individual who was unavailable.
Institutional dependence
Recovery depended on a third-party institution or service that was inaccessible or uncooperative.
Documentation gap
Recovery depended on instructions that were missing, incomplete, or unclear.
Authority mismatch
The person with legal authority to act did not have operational access, or vice versa.
Original text
Rate this translation
Your feedback will be used to help improve Google Translate