CustodyStress
Archive › Multisig quorum failure
Part of the CustodyStress archive of observed Bitcoin custody incidents
CS-01238

Multisig quorum failure — hardware wallet (2024)

Survives
Case description
A 2024 Casa multisignature custody case involved a 2-of-3 setup where the holder's mobile key was stored on a phone that had been factory-reset after the holder upgraded to a new device without first migrating the Casa key. The Casa app was reinstalled on the new device, but the key was not present—it had been on the old device's secure element and was not included in the cloud backup. Casa's recovery process required the holder to demonstrate identity and use their remaining two keys—a hardware key and Casa's server key—to reach quorum and generate a new mobile key. The process took approximately two weeks but required no loss of funds.
Custody context
Stress conditionMultisig quorum failure
Custody systemHardware wallet (single key)
OutcomeSurvives
DocumentationUnknown
Year observed2024
CountryInternational
Structural dependencies observed
Multi-party coordinationInstitutional cooperation required
Outcome interpretation
Access remained possible under the reported conditions.
Source
Privately Reported
Evidence type
News article
Related cases involving multisig quorum failure
77 cases involve multisig quorum failure 274 cases involve hardware wallet (single key) View archive statistics →
This archive documents observed custody survivability failures. It does not attempt to document all Bitcoin losses or security incidents. Submit a case
← All cases
Framework references
Terms guide
Survives
Access remained possible under the reported conditions.
Constrained
Access remained possible, but only with delay, dependence, or significant difficulty.
Blocked
Access was not possible under the reported conditions.
Indeterminate
There was not enough information to determine the outcome.
Single-person knowledge
Recovery depended on information or capability held by one individual who was unavailable.
Institutional dependence
Recovery depended on a third-party institution or service that was inaccessible or uncooperative.
Documentation gap
Recovery depended on instructions that were missing, incomplete, or unclear.
Authority mismatch
The person with legal authority to act did not have operational access, or vice versa.