CustodyStress
Archive › Multisig quorum failure
Part of the CustodyStress archive of observed Bitcoin custody incidents
CS-00058

A 2013 early corporate Bitcoin treasury used a basic 3-of-5 multisig setup.

Indeterminate
Case description
A 2013 early corporate Bitcoin treasury used a basic 3-of-5 multisig setup. Two key holders left the company in a dispute and did not disclose their keys. A third key's hardware failed. With only two of five keys available the company fell below the 3-of-5 quorum threshold and could not move funds from the treasury wallet.
Custody context
Stress conditionMultisig quorum failure
Custody systemExchange custody
OutcomeIndeterminate
DocumentationUnknown
Year observed2013
CountryUnknown
Structural dependencies observed
Single point of failureHardware device requiredInstitutional cooperation required
What this illustrates
There was only one way in. When that path was gone, so was access. It's not clear whether anyone ever regained access.
Outcome interpretation
Not enough information is available to determine the outcome.
Source
Publicly Reported
Evidence type
Forum post
Related cases involving multisig quorum failure
77 cases involve multisig quorum failure 512 cases involve exchange custody View archive statistics →
This archive documents observed custody survivability failures. It does not attempt to document all Bitcoin losses or security incidents. Submit a case
← All cases
Framework references
Terms guide
Survives
Access remained possible under the reported conditions.
Constrained
Access remained possible, but only with delay, dependence, or significant difficulty.
Blocked
Access was not possible under the reported conditions.
Indeterminate
There was not enough information to determine the outcome.
Single-person knowledge
Recovery depended on information or capability held by one individual who was unavailable.
Institutional dependence
Recovery depended on a third-party institution or service that was inaccessible or uncooperative.
Documentation gap
Recovery depended on instructions that were missing, incomplete, or unclear.
Authority mismatch
The person with legal authority to act did not have operational access, or vice versa.
Original text
Rate this translation
Your feedback will be used to help improve Google Translate