CustodyStress
Archive › Legal or authority constraint
Part of the CustodyStress archive of observed Bitcoin custody incidents
CS-01125

Platform bankruptcy — exchange custody (2023)

Survives
Case description
The US Department of Justice filed a motion in June 2023 to block Bittrex's plan to repay customers before government creditors—including OFAC (owed $24 million) and FinCEN (owed $29 million)—were paid. The DOJ argued that customer assets could be 'clawed back' if regulators were not paid in full first. A Delaware bankruptcy judge rejected the motion on 14 June, allowing customer withdrawals to resume on 15 June. The episode illustrated how government regulatory claims could compete directly with legitimate customer recovery rights.
Custody context
Stress conditionLegal or authority constraint
Custody systemExchange custody
OutcomeSurvives
DocumentationUnknown
Year observed2023
CountryUnited States
Structural dependencies observed
Legal process requiredInstitutional cooperation required
Outcome interpretation
Access remained possible under the reported conditions.
Source
Publicly Reported
Evidence type
News article
Related cases involving legal or authority constraint
39 cases involve legal or authority constraint 512 cases involve exchange custody View archive statistics →
This archive documents observed custody survivability failures. It does not attempt to document all Bitcoin losses or security incidents. Submit a case
← All cases
Framework references
Terms guide
Survives
Access remained possible under the reported conditions.
Constrained
Access remained possible, but only with delay, dependence, or significant difficulty.
Blocked
Access was not possible under the reported conditions.
Indeterminate
There was not enough information to determine the outcome.
Single-person knowledge
Recovery depended on information or capability held by one individual who was unavailable.
Institutional dependence
Recovery depended on a third-party institution or service that was inaccessible or uncooperative.
Documentation gap
Recovery depended on instructions that were missing, incomplete, or unclear.
Authority mismatch
The person with legal authority to act did not have operational access, or vice versa.
Original text
Rate this translation
Your feedback will be used to help improve Google Translate