CustodyStress
Archive › Legal or authority constraint
Part of the CustodyStress archive of observed Bitcoin custody incidents
CS-01021

This multi-party legal structure—standard in large Chapter 11 cases—meant

Constrained
Case description
In the Celsius bankruptcy proceedings, the US Trustee's office, the Celsius creditor committee, and the examiner appointed by the court all conducted overlapping investigations into how customer assets had been handled. This multi-party legal structure—standard in large Chapter 11 cases—meant that individual customers had no direct voice in proceedings. Customers who attempted to act independently faced being treated as having violated the automatic stay provisions of the bankruptcy code.
Custody context
Stress conditionLegal or authority constraint
Custody systemExchange custody
OutcomeConstrained
DocumentationUnknown
Year observed2022
CountryUnited States
Structural dependencies observed
Legal process required
What this illustrates
Before anyone could access the funds, a legal process had to be completed first. Whether full access was ultimately possible is unclear, but significant delay or outside intervention was involved.
Outcome interpretation
Access remained possible, but only with delay, dependence, or significant difficulty.
Source
Publicly Reported
Evidence type
News article
Related cases involving legal or authority constraint
39 cases involve legal or authority constraint 512 cases involve exchange custody View archive statistics →
This archive documents observed custody survivability failures. It does not attempt to document all Bitcoin losses or security incidents. Submit a case
← All cases
Framework references
Terms guide
Survives
Access remained possible under the reported conditions.
Constrained
Access remained possible, but only with delay, dependence, or significant difficulty.
Blocked
Access was not possible under the reported conditions.
Indeterminate
There was not enough information to determine the outcome.
Single-person knowledge
Recovery depended on information or capability held by one individual who was unavailable.
Institutional dependence
Recovery depended on a third-party institution or service that was inaccessible or uncooperative.
Documentation gap
Recovery depended on instructions that were missing, incomplete, or unclear.
Authority mismatch
The person with legal authority to act did not have operational access, or vice versa.
Original text
Rate this translation
Your feedback will be used to help improve Google Translate