Forced relocation — hardware wallet (2024)

Indeterminate

Case description

Bitcoin holders in Myanmar displaced by the ongoing civil conflict following the 2021 military coup continued to face practical access barriers in 2024. Areas under conflict saw unreliable internet connectivity and mobile network disruptions. Bitcoin was used by some conflict-affected civilians as a portable store of value that could survive displacement—hardware wallets could be carried across borders where bank accounts could not. However, access in low-connectivity environments required offline transaction signing capabilities that most users were unfamiliar with.

Custody context

Stress condition	Forced relocation
Custody system	Hardware wallet (single key)
Outcome	Indeterminate
Documentation	Unknown
Year observed	2024
Country	Myanmar

Structural dependencies observed

Legal process required

What this illustrates

Before anyone could access the funds, a legal process had to be completed first. It's not clear whether anyone ever regained access.

Outcome interpretation

Not enough information is available to determine the outcome.

Source

Publicly Reported

Evidence type

News article

Evidence link

https://milkroad.com/bankruptcies/

Related cases involving forced relocation

91 cases involve forced relocation 274 cases involve hardware wallet (single key) View archive statistics →

This archive documents observed custody survivability failures. It does not attempt to document all Bitcoin losses or security incidents. Submit a case

← All cases

Framework references

Where Bitcoin Custody Intersects Legal and Fiduciary Authority

Where custody creates gaps in estate planning, fiduciary duty, and professional responsibility.

Professional Scope Boundary Matrix

What each professional or product covers, what they do not, and where gaps form between them.

The Independent Assessment Layer in Bitcoin Custody

How independent diagnostic layers emerge when multiple parties depend on shared infrastructure.