CustodyStress
Archive › Forced relocation
Part of the CustodyStress archive of observed Bitcoin custody incidents
CS-01190

The 2023 Binance settlement included findings about sanctions evasion facilitation.

Blocked
Case description
North Korean citizens and organisations designated under US, EU, and UN sanctions continued in 2023 to be blocked from all Western-linked crypto services. Attempts by sanctioned entities to access Bitcoin through proxy accounts at Western exchanges were monitored by OFAC and resulted in enforcement actions. The 2023 Binance settlement included findings about sanctions evasion facilitation. The case illustrated how geopolitical forced-relocation constraints operated through the international sanctions regime to block entire national populations from regulated crypto infrastructure.
Custody context
Stress conditionForced relocation
Custody systemExchange custody
OutcomeBlocked
DocumentationUnknown
Year observed2023
CountryInternational
Structural dependencies observed
Legal process requiredInstitutional cooperation required
What this illustrates
Before anyone could access the funds, a legal process had to be completed first. Access was not recoverable.
Outcome interpretation
Access was not possible under the reported conditions.
Source
Publicly Reported
Evidence type
News article
Related cases involving forced relocation
91 cases involve forced relocation 512 cases involve exchange custody View archive statistics →
This archive documents observed custody survivability failures. It does not attempt to document all Bitcoin losses or security incidents. Submit a case
← All cases
Framework references
Terms guide
Survives
Access remained possible under the reported conditions.
Constrained
Access remained possible, but only with delay, dependence, or significant difficulty.
Blocked
Access was not possible under the reported conditions.
Indeterminate
There was not enough information to determine the outcome.
Single-person knowledge
Recovery depended on information or capability held by one individual who was unavailable.
Institutional dependence
Recovery depended on a third-party institution or service that was inaccessible or uncooperative.
Documentation gap
Recovery depended on instructions that were missing, incomplete, or unclear.
Authority mismatch
The person with legal authority to act did not have operational access, or vice versa.
Original text
Rate this translation
Your feedback will be used to help improve Google Translate