CustodyStress
Archive › Device loss
Part of the CustodyStress archive of observed Bitcoin custody incidents
CS-00978

A user's laptop was confiscated as part of a divorce proceeding in December 2021.

Survives
Case description
A user's laptop was confiscated as part of a divorce proceeding in December 2021. The estranged spouse's attorney obtained a court order for access to the device. The device contained a wallet. The user was given 72 hours to remove the wallet, which they did. The remaining wallet file on the returned device was then wiped.
Custody context
Stress conditionDevice loss
Custody systemMobile or software wallet
OutcomeSurvives
DocumentationUnknown
Year observed2021
CountryUnknown
Structural dependencies observed
Legal process requiredHardware device required
Outcome interpretation
Access remained possible under the reported conditions.
Source
Publicly Reported
Evidence type
Forum post
Related cases involving device loss
188 cases involve device loss 572 cases involve mobile or software wallet View archive statistics →
This archive documents observed custody survivability failures. It does not attempt to document all Bitcoin losses or security incidents. Submit a case
← All cases
Framework references
Terms guide
Survives
Access remained possible under the reported conditions.
Constrained
Access remained possible, but only with delay, dependence, or significant difficulty.
Blocked
Access was not possible under the reported conditions.
Indeterminate
There was not enough information to determine the outcome.
Single-person knowledge
Recovery depended on information or capability held by one individual who was unavailable.
Institutional dependence
Recovery depended on a third-party institution or service that was inaccessible or uncooperative.
Documentation gap
Recovery depended on instructions that were missing, incomplete, or unclear.
Authority mismatch
The person with legal authority to act did not have operational access, or vice versa.