CustodyStress
Archive › Device loss
Part of the CustodyStress archive of observed Bitcoin custody incidents
CS-00030

James Howells, an IT worker from Newport, Wales, accidentally discarded a hard drive

Blocked
Case description
In November 2013 James Howells, an IT worker from Newport, Wales, accidentally discarded a hard drive containing 8,000 BTC he had mined in 2009. The drive was disposed of with household waste and deposited in a Newport landfill. Despite multiple subsequent recovery attempts, Newport City Council has refused excavation. The BTC remains unrecovered.
Custody context
Stress conditionDevice loss
Custody systemMobile or software wallet
OutcomeBlocked
DocumentationUnknown
Year observed2013
CountryUnited Kingdom
Structural dependencies observed
Hardware device required
What this illustrates
The wallet existed only on that device. When the device became inaccessible, there was no other way back in. Access was not recoverable.
Outcome interpretation
Access was not possible under the reported conditions.
Source
Publicly Reported
Evidence type
News article
Related cases involving device loss
188 cases involve device loss 572 cases involve mobile or software wallet View archive statistics →
This archive documents observed custody survivability failures. It does not attempt to document all Bitcoin losses or security incidents. Submit a case
← All cases
Framework references
Terms guide
Survives
Access remained possible under the reported conditions.
Constrained
Access remained possible, but only with delay, dependence, or significant difficulty.
Blocked
Access was not possible under the reported conditions.
Indeterminate
There was not enough information to determine the outcome.
Single-person knowledge
Recovery depended on information or capability held by one individual who was unavailable.
Institutional dependence
Recovery depended on a third-party institution or service that was inaccessible or uncooperative.
Documentation gap
Recovery depended on instructions that were missing, incomplete, or unclear.
Authority mismatch
The person with legal authority to act did not have operational access, or vice versa.
Original text
Rate this translation
Your feedback will be used to help improve Google Translate