Device lost — hardware wallet 2020

Blocked

Case description

A Trezor user discovered in November 2020 that their device had been replaced by a fake in the retail packaging they had purchased. The counterfeit device had a backdoored firmware. When they initialised the device and generated a wallet, the seed was silently exfiltrated to the attacker. The original device had never been in the box.

Custody context

Stress condition	Device loss
Custody system	Hardware wallet (single key)
Outcome	Blocked
Documentation	Unknown
Year observed	2020
Country	Unknown

Structural dependencies observed

Third-party platform dependencyHardware device required

What this illustrates

Access ran through a third-party platform. When that platform became unavailable, so did the Bitcoin. Access was not recoverable.

Outcome interpretation

Access was not possible under the reported conditions.

Source

Publicly Reported

Evidence type

News article

Evidence link

https://masterthecrypto.com/bitcoin-scams/

Related cases involving device loss

188 cases involve device loss 274 cases involve hardware wallet (single key) View archive statistics →

This archive documents observed custody survivability failures. It does not attempt to document all Bitcoin losses or security incidents. Submit a case

← All cases

Framework references

Where Bitcoin Custody Intersects Legal and Fiduciary Authority

Where custody creates gaps in estate planning, fiduciary duty, and professional responsibility.

Professional Scope Boundary Matrix

What each professional or product covers, what they do not, and where gaps form between them.

The Independent Assessment Layer in Bitcoin Custody

How independent diagnostic layers emerge when multiple parties depend on shared infrastructure.