CustodyStress
Archive › Physical coercion
Part of the CustodyStress archive of observed Bitcoin custody incidents
CS-00783

The letters threatened home invasion unless 0.2 BTC was paid to a specific address.

Blocked
Case description
Following the Ledger data breach publication in December 2020, a wave of physical threatening letters was sent to addresses in the leaked Ledger customer database. The letters threatened home invasion unless 0.2 BTC was paid to a specific address. Multiple recipients reported paying the initial demand, fearing the threats were credible given their address was publicly available.
Custody context
Stress conditionPhysical coercion
Custody systemMobile or software wallet
OutcomeBlocked
DocumentationUnknown
Year observed2020
CountryUnknown
Structural dependencies observed
Single point of failureThird-party platform dependency
What this illustrates
There was only one way in. When that path was gone, so was access. Access was not recoverable.
Outcome interpretation
Access was not possible under the reported conditions.
Source
Publicly Reported
Evidence type
News article
Related cases involving physical coercion
105 cases involve physical coercion 572 cases involve mobile or software wallet View archive statistics →
This archive documents observed custody survivability failures. It does not attempt to document all Bitcoin losses or security incidents. Submit a case
← All cases
Framework references
Terms guide
Survives
Access remained possible under the reported conditions.
Constrained
Access remained possible, but only with delay, dependence, or significant difficulty.
Blocked
Access was not possible under the reported conditions.
Indeterminate
There was not enough information to determine the outcome.
Single-person knowledge
Recovery depended on information or capability held by one individual who was unavailable.
Institutional dependence
Recovery depended on a third-party institution or service that was inaccessible or uncooperative.
Documentation gap
Recovery depended on instructions that were missing, incomplete, or unclear.
Authority mismatch
The person with legal authority to act did not have operational access, or vice versa.