Part of the CustodyStress archive of observed Bitcoin custody incidents
CS-00361
The attackers compelled them to transfer approximately 4 BTC via mobile wallet at
BlockedCase description
A Bitcoin holder was physically assaulted and robbed in May 2016 by attackers who had identified their holdings from social media posts. The attackers compelled them to transfer approximately 4 BTC via mobile wallet at the scene. The victim was threatened with further harm if they reported the incident. They eventually reported to police but the perpetrators were not identified.
Custody context
| Stress condition | Physical coercion |
| Custody system | Mobile or software wallet |
| Outcome | Blocked |
| Documentation | Unknown |
| Year observed | 2016 |
| Country | Unknown |
Structural dependencies observed
What this illustrates
There was only one way in. When that path was gone, so was access. Access was not recoverable.
Outcome interpretation
Access was not possible under the reported conditions.
Source
Publicly Reported
Evidence type
Forum post
Evidence link
Related cases involving physical coercion
105 cases involve physical coercion
572 cases involve mobile or software wallet
View archive statistics →
This archive documents observed custody survivability failures. It does not attempt to document all Bitcoin losses or security incidents.
Submit a case
← All cases
Framework references
Where Bitcoin Custody Intersects Legal and Fiduciary Authority
Where custody creates gaps in estate planning, fiduciary duty, and professional responsibility.
Professional Scope Boundary Matrix
What each professional or product covers, what they do not, and where gaps form between them.
The Independent Assessment Layer in Bitcoin Custody
How independent diagnostic layers emerge when multiple parties depend on shared infrastructure.
Translate