CustodyStress
Archive › Physical coercion
Part of the CustodyStress archive of observed Bitcoin custody incidents
CS-01370

Physical coercion — hardware wallet (2025)

Constrained
Case description
Beginning May 6, 2025, Michael Valentino Teofrasto Carturan, a 28-year-old Italian cryptocurrency trader, was held captive for approximately 17 days in a luxury SoHo townhouse in Manhattan by John Woeltz (37) and William Duplessie (33). The captors—crypto investors who had a prior business relationship with Carturan—lured him to New York by threatening his family. Once inside, they stripped him of his passport and electronics and subjected him to sustained torture: electric shocks, beatings, forced drug use, dangling over a five-story staircase ledge, and threats against his family. The explicit goal was to obtain the password to Carturan's Bitcoin wallet. Carturan escaped on May 23 by feigning cooperation to retrieve his laptop, then fleeing barefoot.
Custody context
Stress conditionPhysical coercion
Custody systemHardware wallet (single key)
OutcomeConstrained
DocumentationUnknown
Year observed2025
CountryUnited States
Structural dependencies observed
Biometric or physical presence
What this illustrates
Access required in-person verification that couldn't be arranged under the circumstances. Whether full access was ultimately possible is unclear, but significant delay or outside intervention was involved.
Outcome interpretation
Access remained possible, but only with delay, dependence, or significant difficulty.
Source
Publicly Reported
Evidence type
News article
Related cases involving physical coercion
105 cases involve physical coercion 274 cases involve hardware wallet (single key) View archive statistics →
This archive documents observed custody survivability failures. It does not attempt to document all Bitcoin losses or security incidents. Submit a case
← All cases
Framework references
Terms guide
Survives
Access remained possible under the reported conditions.
Constrained
Access remained possible, but only with delay, dependence, or significant difficulty.
Blocked
Access was not possible under the reported conditions.
Indeterminate
There was not enough information to determine the outcome.
Single-person knowledge
Recovery depended on information or capability held by one individual who was unavailable.
Institutional dependence
Recovery depended on a third-party institution or service that was inaccessible or uncooperative.
Documentation gap
Recovery depended on instructions that were missing, incomplete, or unclear.
Authority mismatch
The person with legal authority to act did not have operational access, or vice versa.
Original text
Rate this translation
Your feedback will be used to help improve Google Translate