CustodyStress
Archive › Physical coercion
Part of the CustodyStress archive of observed Bitcoin custody incidents
CS-01294

The gang ultimately drained approximately $2 million from the family's accounts

Blocked
Case description
On the evening of 27 April 2024, four masked attackers disguised as Canada Post delivery workers gained entry to the Port Moody, British Columbia home of a Bitcoin investor who had publicly boasted about his cryptocurrency success within the local Chinese community. The family—a husband, wife, and teenage daughter—were restrained with zip ties. Over a 13-hour ordeal, the father was waterboarded, stripped, and repeatedly beaten while the attackers demanded 200 Bitcoin (approximately $26 million at the time). The gang ultimately drained approximately $2 million (30 BTC) from the family's accounts before departing. The daughter escaped through a rear door the following morning and called police.
Custody context
Stress conditionPhysical coercion
Custody systemHardware wallet (single key)
OutcomeBlocked
DocumentationUnknown
Year observed2024
CountryCanada
Structural dependencies observed
Biometric or physical presence
What this illustrates
Access required in-person verification that couldn't be arranged under the circumstances. Access was not recoverable.
Outcome interpretation
Access was not possible under the reported conditions.
Source
Publicly Reported
Evidence type
News article
Related cases involving physical coercion
105 cases involve physical coercion 274 cases involve hardware wallet (single key) View archive statistics →
This archive documents observed custody survivability failures. It does not attempt to document all Bitcoin losses or security incidents. Submit a case
← All cases
Framework references
Terms guide
Survives
Access remained possible under the reported conditions.
Constrained
Access remained possible, but only with delay, dependence, or significant difficulty.
Blocked
Access was not possible under the reported conditions.
Indeterminate
There was not enough information to determine the outcome.
Single-person knowledge
Recovery depended on information or capability held by one individual who was unavailable.
Institutional dependence
Recovery depended on a third-party institution or service that was inaccessible or uncooperative.
Documentation gap
Recovery depended on instructions that were missing, incomplete, or unclear.
Authority mismatch
The person with legal authority to act did not have operational access, or vice versa.