CustodyStress
Archive › Physical coercion
Part of the CustodyStress archive of observed Bitcoin custody incidents
CS-01048

Physical coercion — hardware wallet (2022)

Blocked
Case description
A gang operating across multiple US states conducted a series of crypto-targeted home invasions in late 2022, entering homes of known crypto holders—identified through public records, social media, and blockchain analysis—and coercing victims at gunpoint into transferring Bitcoin and other assets. Bloomberg documented multiple incidents, noting that perpetrators had specifically chosen targets based on the known immutability and irreversibility of on-chain transfers.
Custody context
Stress conditionPhysical coercion
Custody systemHardware wallet (single key)
OutcomeBlocked
DocumentationUnknown
Year observed2022
CountryUnited States
Structural dependencies observed
Biometric or physical presence
What this illustrates
Access required in-person verification that couldn't be arranged under the circumstances. Access was not recoverable.
Outcome interpretation
Access was not possible under the reported conditions.
Source
Publicly Reported
Evidence type
News article
Related cases involving physical coercion
105 cases involve physical coercion 274 cases involve hardware wallet (single key) View archive statistics →
This archive documents observed custody survivability failures. It does not attempt to document all Bitcoin losses or security incidents. Submit a case
← All cases
Framework references
Terms guide
Survives
Access remained possible under the reported conditions.
Constrained
Access remained possible, but only with delay, dependence, or significant difficulty.
Blocked
Access was not possible under the reported conditions.
Indeterminate
There was not enough information to determine the outcome.
Single-person knowledge
Recovery depended on information or capability held by one individual who was unavailable.
Institutional dependence
Recovery depended on a third-party institution or service that was inaccessible or uncooperative.
Documentation gap
Recovery depended on instructions that were missing, incomplete, or unclear.
Authority mismatch
The person with legal authority to act did not have operational access, or vice versa.
Original text
Rate this translation
Your feedback will be used to help improve Google Translate