CustodyStress
Archive › Physical coercion
Part of the CustodyStress archive of observed Bitcoin custody incidents
CS-00829

The former colleague threatened to front-run the desk's large orders unless paid 5 BTC

Constrained
Case description
A Bitcoin OTC desk employee was extorted in June 2021 by a former colleague who had obtained knowledge of the desk's proprietary trading positions. The former colleague threatened to front-run the desk's large orders unless paid 5 BTC monthly. The desk paid two months before engaging law enforcement. The former colleague was arrested.
Custody context
Stress conditionPhysical coercion
Custody systemExchange custody
OutcomeConstrained
DocumentationUnknown
Year observed2021
CountryUnknown
Structural dependencies observed
Single point of failure
What this illustrates
No backup path existed. One point of failure was all it took. Whether full access was ultimately possible is unclear, but significant delay or outside intervention was involved.
Outcome interpretation
Access remained possible, but only with delay, dependence, or significant difficulty.
Source
Publicly Reported
Evidence type
Forum post
Related cases involving physical coercion
101 cases involve physical coercion 471 cases involve exchange custody View archive statistics →
This archive documents observed custody survivability failures. It does not attempt to document all Bitcoin losses or security incidents. Submit a case
← All cases
Framework references
Terms guide
Survives
Access remained possible under the reported conditions.
Constrained
Access remained possible, but only with delay, dependence, or significant difficulty.
Blocked
Access was not possible under the reported conditions.
Indeterminate
There was not enough information to determine the outcome.
Single-person knowledge
Recovery depended on information or capability held by one individual who was unavailable.
Institutional dependence
Recovery depended on a third-party institution or service that was inaccessible or uncooperative.
Documentation gap
Recovery depended on instructions that were missing, incomplete, or unclear.
Authority mismatch
The person with legal authority to act did not have operational access, or vice versa.
Original text
Rate this translation
Your feedback will be used to help improve Google Translate