CustodyStress
Archive › Physical coercion
Part of the CustodyStress archive of observed Bitcoin custody incidents
CS-00332

The attacker demanded 2 BTC or threatened to forward the communications to the trader's

Blocked
Case description
A 2016 documented case describes a Bitcoin trader who was blackmailed by an individual who claimed to have accessed private communications. The attacker demanded 2 BTC or threatened to forward the communications to the trader's employer. The victim transferred the BTC. The extortion was later reported to police and the perpetrator identified through exchange transaction records.
Custody context
Stress conditionPhysical coercion
Custody systemExchange custody
OutcomeBlocked
DocumentationUnknown
Year observed2016
CountryUnknown
Structural dependencies observed
Single point of failure
What this illustrates
There was only one way in. When that path was gone, so was access. Access was not recoverable.
Outcome interpretation
Access was not possible under the reported conditions.
Source
Publicly Reported
Evidence type
Forum post
Related cases involving physical coercion
105 cases involve physical coercion 512 cases involve exchange custody View archive statistics →
This archive documents observed custody survivability failures. It does not attempt to document all Bitcoin losses or security incidents. Submit a case
← All cases
Framework references
Terms guide
Survives
Access remained possible under the reported conditions.
Constrained
Access remained possible, but only with delay, dependence, or significant difficulty.
Blocked
Access was not possible under the reported conditions.
Indeterminate
There was not enough information to determine the outcome.
Single-person knowledge
Recovery depended on information or capability held by one individual who was unavailable.
Institutional dependence
Recovery depended on a third-party institution or service that was inaccessible or uncooperative.
Documentation gap
Recovery depended on instructions that were missing, incomplete, or unclear.
Authority mismatch
The person with legal authority to act did not have operational access, or vice versa.
Original text
Rate this translation
Your feedback will be used to help improve Google Translate