Reviewing Bitcoin Inheritance Arrangements
Reviewing Existing Inheritance Arrangements
This memo is published by CustodyStress, an independent Bitcoin custody stress test that produces reference documents for individuals, families, and professionals.
What Review Means
A holder believes bitcoin inheritance arrangements exist. The holder wants to review them. The phrase "review bitcoin inheritance" describes reading and examining what exists. The holder is present and calm. No emergency exists.
This page examines what a bitcoin inheritance review reveals. It also describes what remains hidden. The review captures a single point in time.
What Review Means
When a holder decides to review bitcoin inheritance materials, the holder reads and examines. The holder looks at documents. The holder reads notes. The holder sees what was written.
Review is examination. It asks: what exists? It does not ask: will this work under stress? It does not ask: can someone else understand this?
Reviewing bitcoin inheritance shows what materials are present. It does not show what materials will accomplish.
What Review Observes
When a holder decides to review bitcoin inheritance arrangements, the review observes certain things. The holder can see whether documents exist. The holder can see whether notes are readable. The holder can see whether explanations make sense to the holder.
The review confirms that materials are present and recognizable. The holder wrote them or collected them. The holder remembers what they mean. The holder can fill in gaps from memory.
The behavior reflects what the holder knows and can read. It does not reflect what another party would understand.
What Review Cannot Observe
A bitcoin inheritance review run by the holder excludes certain conditions. The holder is present. The holder is calm. The holder remembers everything.
Review inheritance bitcoin materials cannot observe what happens when the holder is absent. It cannot observe what happens when years have passed. It cannot observe what happens when a spouse, child, or executor reads the same materials without the holder's memory.
The review excludes stress. The review excludes grief. The review excludes time pressure. These conditions change how materials are understood.
The Holder Reviews Documents
The system in a scenario involves a holder who wants to review bitcoin inheritance documents. The holder observes materials under conditions where prior knowledge is already present.
The review reflects holder-present understanding. The holder recognizes what they wrote. The holder understands the terms used. No confusion is observed under the tested conditions.
A designated heir does not have this context. The heir did not write the documents. The heir does not know what terms mean. Recovery in a scenario where the heir reads the same documents would start from a different position.
Review Versus Simulation
When a holder decides to review bitcoin inheritance materials, the holder examines what exists. The holder reads. The holder looks. The holder recognizes.
Simulation models what happens under stress. Simulation asks: if I were gone, could someone else use these materials? Simulation introduces conditions the holder cannot observe by reading alone.
Review shows what is present. Simulation shows what might happen. These are different activities with different results.
Memory Fills Gaps
The system in a scenario involves a holder reviewing bitcoin inheritance notes. The notes say "keys stored securely." The holder knows what "keys" means. The holder knows what "securely" refers to.
The review does not reveal that these details are vague to others. The holder's memory fills the gaps. The review feels clear because the holder's knowledge clarifies it.
Without the holder's memory, the gaps remain. "Keys stored securely" does not say which keys. It does not say where. It does not say how to access them. The review did not test whether the notes alone are enough.
A Snapshot in Time
A bitcoin inheritance review happens at a specific moment. The holder remembers everything at that moment. Terms are familiar. Locations are known. Context is complete.
Time changes these conditions. Memory fades. Terms become unfamiliar. What seemed clear becomes confusing. A review conducted today does not show what happens five years from now.
The holder may forget what certain notes mean. The holder may forget where referenced items are stored. The holder may forget context that once seemed obvious. The review captured a moment. It did not capture the future.
What Third Parties Would Experience
The holder reviews and sees clear materials. A third party would see something different. Terms that seem obvious to the holder may confuse an heir. References that seem clear to the holder may puzzle an executor.
A third party reading the same materials would start from a different position. They would not know terminology. They would not know what references point to. They would not know which materials apply to which assets.
The holder's review does not predict a third party's experience. Different starting knowledge produces different understanding.
Review Versus Verification
When a holder decides to review bitcoin inheritance arrangements, the holder examines materials. The holder asks: what is here? The holder sees what exists.
Verification tests whether materials accomplish their purpose. Verification asks: do these materials work? Verification introduces outcomes the holder cannot observe by examining alone.
Reviewing bitcoin inheritance shows what is present. Verifying tests what is possible. These are different activities.
The Confidence Gap
A bitcoin inheritance review often produces confidence. The holder sees the materials. The holder recognizes the documents. The outcome is interpreted as sufficient by the holder.
This confidence reflects what the holder observed. It does not reflect what remains unobserved. The holder examined materials using holder knowledge. The holder did not examine materials using heir confusion or executor unfamiliarity.
A review inheritance bitcoin check conducted by the holder reveals holder understanding at one moment. It does not reveal third-party understanding at a future moment.
Conclusion
When a holder decides to review bitcoin inheritance materials, the review captures what the holder sees at that moment. Documents are readable to the person who wrote them. Notes are clear to the person who remembers the context.
Review does not include other situations. It does not include the holder's absence. It does not include time passing and memory fading. It does not include third-party reading without holder knowledge.
The result of a bitcoin inheritance review conducted by the holder shows what happens when the holder examines it. It does not show what happens after the holder is gone. What is clear to the holder today may not be clear to others later.
System Context
Examining Bitcoin Custody Under Stress
Checking a Bitcoin Inheritance Plan
For anyone who holds Bitcoin — on an exchange, in a wallet, through a service, or in self-custody — and wants to know what happens to it if something happens to them.
Start Bitcoin Custody Stress Test$179 · 12-month access · Unlimited assessments
A structured, scenario-based diagnostic that produces reference documents for your spouse, executor, or attorney — no accounts connected, no keys shared.
Sample what the assessment produces