Bitcoin Estate Protection Options

Custody and Legal Approaches for Estate Protection

This memo is published by CustodyStress, an independent Bitcoin custody stress test that produces reference documents for individuals, families, and professionals.

Legal Structure Options

Someone planning for bitcoin inheritance wants to know what approaches exist. They search for bitcoin estate protection options to understand the landscape: what categories of solution exist, what each involves, and what problems each addresses. Before choosing, they want to see the range of possibilities. The search is for orientation, not yet for selection.

What follows covers what categories of approach exist in this landscape. Estate protection for bitcoin involves combinations of legal structures, technical arrangements, documentation, and third parties. Each category handles different aspects of the protection problem. No single option solves everything; most real-world approaches combine elements from multiple categories.

---

Legal Structure Options

Wills represent the simplest legal option. A will can bequeath bitcoin to specified beneficiaries. The legal mechanism works; the operational mechanism does not come from the will itself. A will says who receives the bitcoin. It does not say how they access it. Legal transfer and technical transfer remain separate problems.

Trusts add structure that wills lack. A trust can hold bitcoin during the holder's life and continue after death. Trustees manage according to trust terms. The trust provides continuity—no probate interruption—and can specify management terms beyond simple distribution. But trusts also require trustees capable of handling bitcoin, which is not automatic.

Powers of attorney address living incapacity rather than death. A POA authorizes someone to act on the holder's behalf if the holder cannot. For bitcoin, this authority matters only if paired with actual access capability. Legal authorization without keys accomplishes nothing against the blockchain.

Each legal structure solves part of the estate protection problem. None solves the technical access problem. Legal options establish authority and specify distribution. Technical options establish capability. Estate protection requires both, but legal and technical often operate independently.

---

Technical Arrangement Options

Single-signature custody with documented backup is the simplest technical arrangement. One seed phrase controls everything. Written instructions explain how to use it. This approach depends entirely on documentation quality and security. Simple to understand but vulnerable to single points of failure—loss of the seed phrase, theft of the backup, or confusion in the documentation.

Multisig distributes control across multiple keys. No single key can move the bitcoin; some threshold of keys is required. This approach can involve family members, professionals, or institutions holding different keys. Complexity increases, but so does resilience against single-point failures. Estate planning must account for how the multiple keys transfer at death.

Third-party custody transfers the technical problem to an institution. Exchanges or custodians hold the bitcoin. Estate transfer looks more like traditional asset transfer—showing legal documents to an institution that recognizes them. But third-party custody introduces counterparty risk and removes the holder's direct control.

Hybrid approaches combine elements. Perhaps most bitcoin is in self-custody with a portion in custodial accounts for easy estate transfer. Perhaps multisig involves both family members and a professional service. The combinations are numerous. Each hybrid reflects choices about which risks to accept and which to mitigate.

---

Documentation Options

Letters of instruction provide informal guidance to heirs, executors, or family. These documents explain where things are, how to access them, and what to do. They lack legal force but carry practical value. A letter can say things a will cannot—technical details, personal context, warnings about what not to do.

Custody guides document the holder's setup in detail. More formal than letters of instruction, these documents describe the complete custody arrangement: hardware used, software involved, backup locations, access procedures. They serve whoever needs to take over custody, whether that is family, an executor, or a trustee.

Video or audio recordings supplement written documents for some holders. Seeing and hearing the deceased explain their setup may communicate nuance that written words miss. These recordings carry emotional weight beyond their practical content. They also carry risks—recordings can be intercepted or misunderstood out of context.

Digital asset inventories list what exists and where. An inventory does not explain how to access anything; it lists what needs accessing. For estates with multiple wallets, multiple currencies, or complex holdings, an inventory helps heirs understand the full picture before diving into recovery.

---

Third-Party Service Options

Inheritance-focused custody services exist specifically for this problem. These services hold keys or key components with instructions to release them upon verified death. They add a layer between the holder and their heirs—a layer designed to bridge the gap when the holder is gone. The service introduces counterparty risk but may simplify what heirs face.

Professional fiduciaries can serve as trustees or executors with bitcoin capability. Unlike general-purpose fiduciaries, these professionals understand bitcoin custody. They charge for their services and may have their own custody requirements. Their involvement adds expertise but also cost and complexity.

Key recovery services help when access is partially but not completely lost. If heirs have most of a seed phrase, or a hardware wallet without the PIN, specialized services may help recover access. These services are not estate planning per se but may become relevant when estate plans prove incomplete.

Attorney and CPA services with bitcoin knowledge help structure the legal and tax aspects. Not all professionals understand bitcoin well. Those who do can draft better documents, anticipate problems others miss, and coordinate the legal and technical sides more effectively. Finding such professionals may be difficult depending on location.

---

How Options Combine

Real estate protection typically mixes categories. A trust provides legal structure while single-signature custody provides technical arrangement while a letter of instruction provides documentation while an attorney with bitcoin knowledge provides professional support. No single option addresses every aspect.

The combinations depend on circumstances. Large estates may justify elaborate structures with multiple professionals. Small holdings may work with simple documentation and family-held backups. Technical holders may create sophisticated multisig arrangements. Non-technical holders may prefer custodial solutions that outsource complexity.

Trade-offs exist within each category and between categories. More security often means more complexity. More third-party involvement means less direct control. More thorough documentation means more maintenance burden. Each choice has costs that must be weighed against benefits.

No standard combination applies to everyone. The right mix depends on holding size, technical capability, family situation, trust relationships, and personal priorities. What works for one holder may be wrong for another. The landscape of options provides raw material; the holder must shape it to their situation.

---

What All Options Share

Every option requires the holder to act while alive and capable. None works retroactively. A deceased holder without estate planning leaves heirs to improvise. The options exist for those who prepare in advance. Preparation requires effort that some holders never invest.

Every option involves tradeoffs. No approach eliminates risk entirely. Security against theft may create risk of loss. Simplicity for heirs may sacrifice protection during the holder's life. Third-party involvement may trade counterparty risk for operational simplicity. Perfection is not available; tradeoffs must be accepted.

Every option depends on execution, not just selection. Choosing a good approach accomplishes nothing without implementing it. Implementation requires ongoing maintenance—documents become outdated, circumstances change, and relationships evolve. Selecting an option is the beginning, not the end.

Every option can fail. Legal structures depend on courts functioning. Technical arrangements depend on hardware surviving and software remaining usable. Documentation depends on being findable and understandable. Third parties depend on remaining solvent and honest. Failure modes exist regardless of which approach is chosen.

---

How the Landscape Changes

New options emerge as the industry develops. Services designed for bitcoin inheritance did not exist years ago. They exist now and will likely expand. Technical innovations like improved multisig, better recovery tools, or blockchain-native inheritance mechanisms may change what is possible.

Legal clarity evolves. Courts and legislatures gradually develop precedent and law around digital assets. What is uncertain today may become clearer tomorrow—or may become more complicated as new rules emerge. Options that work under current law may need revision as law develops.

Standards may emerge over time. Currently, estate protection for bitcoin is largely improvised. Best practices are not standardized. As more holders die and more estates pass bitcoin to heirs, patterns will develop. What works and what fails will become clearer through accumulated experience.

The holder planning today works with today's options. Those options may look limited compared to what exists in ten years. But waiting for better options means remaining unprotected in the meantime. The practical choice is working with available options rather than waiting for ideal ones.

---

Assessment

Bitcoin estate protection options span legal structures, technical arrangements, documentation, and third-party services. Legal options establish authority; technical options establish capability. Documentation bridges knowledge gaps. Third parties add expertise or absorb complexity. Most real approaches combine elements across categories.

No single option solves the entire problem. Each involves tradeoffs. The right combination depends on circumstances the holder must assess. All options require action while the holder is capable and depend on execution, not just selection.

The landscape changes as the industry develops, legal clarity evolves, and standards emerge. Today's options may be superseded by tomorrow's innovations. But protection today requires working with what exists today, accepting current limitations while preparing for an uncertain future.

---

System Context

Examining Bitcoin Custody Under Stress

Bitcoin Custody Overlooked Risks

Bitcoin Custody Behavior When Moving Countries

← Return to CustodyStress